Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions121 g/km
- Best estimated range1,087 km675 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 30.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 1,087km675mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 422L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 30.8 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 16 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,087 km 675 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 1,087 km 675 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 178 km (111 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
- Emits 58 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























