Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Peugeot 207 SW

1.6 RC

174 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    699 km
    434 mi
  • Largest trunk
    419 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,353 kg
    2,983 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Power
200hp149kW
174hp130kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,353kg2,983lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
77.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
67.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
34.6s
Calculated
33.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
676km420mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,156mm164in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,748mm69in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,527mm60in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,540mm100in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,467mm58in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,461mm58in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
337L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,258L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
50L
CO2 emissions-
175g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RCPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,500 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC6,000 rpm1,600-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.6 s
33.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
174 hp
130 kW

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 26 hp more than Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
1,353 kg
2,983 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
225 km/h
140 mph
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.2 s
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC7.6 s

Although Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has more power, Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
676 km
420 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
225 km/h
140 mph
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
174 hp
130 kW
7.6 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Power
174 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
337 L
11.9 cu ft
Length
4,156 mm
163.6 in
Height
1,527 mm
60.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Power
174 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.2 s
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Power
200 hp
149 kW
174 hp
130 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,353 kg
2,983 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
337 L
11.9 cu ft
Length
4,156 mm
163.6 in
Height
1,527 mm
60.1 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
676 km
420 mi
CO2 score
-
175 g/km
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
337 L
11.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC

  • Is 157 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
1.6 RC
RC 1.6
VS
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RCvsPeugeot207RC 1.6
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
1.6 RC
RC 1.6
VS
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RCvsPeugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
2.0 T
2.4 D5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
2.0 T
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
1.6 RC
1.4 TSI
VS
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RCvsVolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
1.6 RC
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RCvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
1.6 RC
2.0 T
VS
Peugeot207 SW1.6 RCvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T vs Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC - car comparison - FastVsFaster