Peugeot 207 SW
Car comparison
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RCvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Most powerful178 hp133 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,353 kg2,983 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 174hp130kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,353kg2,983lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 676km420mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,156mm164in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,748mm69in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,527mm60in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,467mm58in | - |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 337L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,258L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP has 4 hp more than Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.6 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
Although Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP has more power, Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 676 km 420 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 174 hp 130 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 676 km 420 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 337 L 11.9 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
- Has 171 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























