Seat Exeo ST
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDIvsPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 207 SW
1.6 RC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Largest trunk442 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful174 hp130 kW
- Lightest1,353 kg2,983 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 174hp130kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,353kg2,983lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,186km737mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,156mm164in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,527mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,467mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 337L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 1,258L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW |
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,186 km 737 mi |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 174 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,186 km 737 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 337 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI | Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 511 km (317 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 162 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























