Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6vsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Cadillac BLS

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,585 kg
    3,494 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.9 L/100 km
    13.9 mpg US
    16.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    537 km
    334 mi
  • Largest trunk
    425 L
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    255 hp
    190 kW
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255hp190kW
255hp190kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
25.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
504km313mi
Calculated
537km334mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,792cc170cu in
2,792cc170cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,680mm184in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,752mm69in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,471mm58in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
419L
425L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
-
Doors
5
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
58L
CO2 emissions-
259g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6PowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
CadillacBLS2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
25.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V68.0 s
CadillacBLS2.8 T V67.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
504 km
313 mi
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
537 km
334 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
7.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
8.0 s
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
255 hp
190 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Range score
504 km
313 mi
537 km
334 mi
CO2 score
-
259 g/km
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
2.8 T V6
3.6 i V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsCadillacSTS3.6 i V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.8 T V6
3.3 V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
2.8 T V6
2.4i 20V T5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.8 T V6
2.4i T5 20V
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 vs Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster