Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6vsAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6)

3.2 FSI V6

256 hp3123 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2006-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Most powerful
    256 hp
    191 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.6 L/100 km
    15.1 mpg US
    18.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    727 km
    452 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,630 kg
    3,594 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    156 hp/t
    117 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
255hp190kW
256hp191kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
29.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
504km313mi
Calculated
727km452mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,792cc170cu in
3,123cc191cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,934mm194in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,862mm73in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,519mm60in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,833mm112in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,596mm63in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,587mm62in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,660L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V66,500 rpm3,250 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
29.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
256 hp
191 kW

AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 has 1 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
1,800 kg
3,968 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V68.0 s
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V67.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
504 km
313 mi
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
727 km
452 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
256 hp
191 kW
7.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,934 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,519 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
8.0 s
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
256 hp
191 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,934 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,519 mm
59.8 in
Range score
504 km
313 mi
727 km
452 mi
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 170 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 223 km (139 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 146 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
3.2 FSI V6
2.7 T V6
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 T V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6
2.8 T V6
2.4i 20V T5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
3.2 FSI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.8 T V6
330xi
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsBMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 vs AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster