AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range722 km448 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km448mi Calculated | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,123cc191cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,933mm194in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,463mm58in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,843mm112in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,660L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 233g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.2 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 722 km 448 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 504 km 313 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 448 mi | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 233 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 217 km (135 mi) more estimated range
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























