Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsCadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac Allante
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range633 km394 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 472Nm348lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 96.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 538km334mi Calculated | 633km394mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 4,540mm179in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 76L |
| CO2 emissions | 278g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 299 hp 223 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 11 hp more than Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 538 km 334 mi |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 633 km 394 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 299 hp 223 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 538 km 334 mi | 633 km 394 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 278 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 | Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 79 Nm more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 245 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























