BMW M3 Convertible (E46)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range538 km334 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,363mm54in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,508mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has 33 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 521 km 324 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 538 km 334 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 107 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























