Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 CLK 430vsCadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999

CLK 430

279 hp4266 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1997-2003
VS

Cadillac Allante

4.6 i V8 32V

299 hp4565 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1993-1996

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Most powerful
    299 hp
    223 kW
  • Lightest
    1,700 kg
    3,748 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.8 L/100 km
    15.9 mpg US
    19.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    633 km
    394 mi
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
279hp208kW
299hp223kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
393Nm290lb-ft
Curb weight
1,755kg3,869lb
1,700kg3,748lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
104.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
96.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
27.1s
Calculated
27.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
508km316mi
Calculated
633km394mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,266cc260cu in
4,565cc279cu in
Length
4,567mm180in
4,540mm179in
Width
1,722mm68in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,382mm54in
1,310mm52in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,474mm58in
1,535mm60in
Trunk volume-
460L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
62L
76L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 4305,750 rpm3,000-4,400 rpm6,000 rpm
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V6,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.1 s
27.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
279 hp
208 kW
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
299 hp
223 kW

Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 and Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
393 Nm
290 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
1,700 kg
3,748 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
508 km
316 mi
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
633 km
394 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
279 hp
208 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
299 hp
223 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
Power
279 hp
208 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
299 hp
223 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,540 mm
178.7 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
Power
279 hp
208 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
299 hp
223 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
279 hp
208 kW
299 hp
223 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
393 Nm
290 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
Fuel consumption
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,540 mm
178.7 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
Range score
508 km
316 mi
633 km
394 mi
Trunk score
-
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
Consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.35 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.36 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,203 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 430
Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 CLK 430 vs Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster