Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsCadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Cadillac Allante

4.6 i V8 32V

299 hp4565 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1993-1996

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.0 s
Fastest top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Most powerful
310 hp
231 kW
Highest torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
Lightest
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Best power-to-weight
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Lowest city consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Best overall score
58/100
Best performance score
65/100
Best practicality score
42/100

Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V

Lowest combined fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Best estimated range
633 km
394 mi
Largest trunk
460 L
Best economy score
75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Power	310hp231kW	299hp223kW
Torque	461Nm340lb-ft	393Nm290lb-ft
Curb weight	1,605kg3,538lb	1,700kg3,748lb
Gross weight	1,930kg4,255lb	-
Top speed	257 km/h 160 mph	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated	96.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.0s	6.9s
0-200 km/h	22.8s Calculated	27.4s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.7s Calculated	6.5s Calculated
Fuel consumption	12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK	12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK	14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK	8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.1s Calculated	14.9s Calculated
Power-to-weight	193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated	176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated	231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	512km318mi Calculated	633km394mi Calculated
Displacement	5,665cc346cu in	4,565cc279cu in
Length	4,914mm193in	4,540mm179in
Width	1,882mm74in	1,865mm73in
Height	1,315mm52in	1,310mm52in
Wheelbase	2,568mm101in	2,525mm99in
Front track	1,542mm61in	1,535mm60in
Rear track	1,540mm61in	1,535mm60in
Trunk volume	215L	460L
Max trunk volume	930L	-
Doors	2	2
Seats	4	2
Fuel tank	64L	76L
CO2 emissions	293g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32VPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	5,200 rpm	4,000 rpm	5,450 rpm
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	6,000 rpm	4,400 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.7 s	6.5 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.0 s	6.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	22.8 s	27.4 s
Top speed	257 km/h 160 mph	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.1 s	6.5 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.2 s	9.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.9 s	12.5 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.1 s	14.9 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	163 km/h 101 mph	155 km/h 96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	299 hp 223 kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 11 hp more than Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	461 Nm 340 lb-ft
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	393 Nm 290 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	1,605 kg 3,538 lb
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	1,700 kg 3,748 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	257 km/h 160 mph
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	6.0 s
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	512 km 318 mi
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	633 km 394 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW	6.0 s	257 km/h 160 mph
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	299 hp 223 kW	6.9 s	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V

Power	299 hp 223 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	460 L 16.2 cu ft
Length	4,540 mm 178.7 in
Height	1,310 mm 51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V

Power	299 hp 223 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

12.0 L/100 km

19.6 mpg US

23.5 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK	6.0 s
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK	6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK
CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V	176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp	12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V

Power

310 hp

231 kW

299 hp

223 kW

Torque

461 Nm

340 lb-ft

393 Nm

290 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.0 s

6.9 s

Top speed

257 km/h

160 mph

Unrestricted

250 km/h155 mph

Restricted

240 km/h149 mph

Lightness

1,605 kg

3,538 lb

1,700 kg

3,748 lb

Fuel consumption

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

12.0 L/100 km

19.6 mpg US

23.5 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	460 L 16.2 cu ft
Length	4,540 mm 178.7 in
Height	1,310 mm 51.6 in

Range score

512 km

318 mi

633 km

394 mi

CO2 score

293 g/km

Trunk score

215 L

7.6 cu ft

460 L

16.2 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

193 hp/t

144 kW/t

5.2 kg/hp

176 hp/t

131 kW/t

5.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8	Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
Consumption	12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK	12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	21.70 LC100 km	21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	34.92 LC100 mi	33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal	1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,255 LC/year	3,150 LC/year