Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2014-2017
VS

BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012

4.4 V8

560 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2012-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,335 kg
    5,148 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    236 hp/t
    176 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.3 L/100 km
    12.9 mpg US
    15.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    820 km
    510 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
550hp410kW
560hp418kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
2,335kg5,148lb
2,380kg5,247lb
Gross weight-
2,905kg6,404lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
16.7s
Calculated
17.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km510mi
Calculated
612km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,872mm192in
4,876mm192in
Width
2,019mm79in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,983mm78in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,933mm115in
Front track-
1,660mm65in
Rear track-
1,672mm66in
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
105L
85L
CO2 emissions
298g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V86,000 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.7 s
17.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
560 hp
418 kW

BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
2,380 kg
5,247 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V84.7 s
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V84.7 s

Although BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
820 km
510 mi
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
612 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
560 hp
418 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,876 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,983 mm
78.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.7 s
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
4.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
2,380 kg
5,247 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,876 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,983 mm
78.1 in
Range score
820 km
510 mi
612 km
380 mi
CO2 score
298 g/km
-
Power-to-weight score
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year3,649 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 209 km (130 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
BMW X6 M (E71) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG GLS 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
4.4 V8
50i
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 vs BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster