Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2014-2017
VS

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166)

AMG GL 63

558 hp5461 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    2,335 kg
    5,148 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    236 hp/t
    176 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    820 km
    510 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    80/100

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63

  • Most powerful
    558 hp
    416 kW
  • Highest torque
    760 Nm
    561 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    288 g/km
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Power
550hp410kW
558hp416kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
760Nm561lb-ft
Curb weight
2,335kg5,148lb
2,505kg5,523lb
Gross weight-
3,250kg7,165lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
78.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
16.7s
Calculated
19.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km510mi
Calculated
813km505mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
5,461cc333cu in
Length
4,872mm192in
5,141mm202in
Width
2,019mm79in
1,982mm78in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,850mm73in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
3,075mm121in
Front track-
1,677mm66in
Rear track-
1,696mm67in
Trunk volume-
680L
Max trunk volume-
2,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
105L
100L
CO2 emissions
298g/km
288g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 635,250-5,750 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.7 s
19.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
558 hp
416 kW

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 has 8 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
760 Nm
561 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
2,505 kg
5,523 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V84.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 634.9 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
820 km
510 mi
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
813 km
505 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
558 hp
416 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Power
558 hp
416 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,141 mm
202.4 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Power
558 hp
416 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Power
550 hp
410 kW
558 hp
416 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
2,505 kg
5,523 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,141 mm
202.4 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in
Range score
820 km
510 mi
813 km
505 mi
CO2 score
298 g/km
288 g/km
Trunk score
-
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

  • Is 170 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 7 km (5 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
AMG GL 63
GL 500
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 500
SVR 5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
AMG GL 63
GL 500
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
AMG GL 63
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
AMG GL 63
AMG GLS 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
AMG GL 63
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W164)Facelift 2008AMG ML 63 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
AMG GL 63
GLS 600 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 - car comparison - FastVsFaster