Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II

Turbo S 4.8 V8

550 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2013-2014
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,215 kg
    4,883 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    248 hp/t
    185 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    270 g/km
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550hp410kW
550hp410kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
2,215kg4,883lb
2,335kg5,148lb
Gross weight
2,880kg6,349lb
-
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.6s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
14.4s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
248hp/t185kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton
Calculated
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
739km459mi
Calculated
820km510mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,846mm191in
4,872mm192in
Width
1,939mm76in
2,019mm79in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,655mm65in
-
Rear track
1,669mm66in
-
Ground clearance
215mm8in
-
Trunk volume
670L
-
Max trunk volume
1,780L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.4 s
16.7 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
178 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
2,215 kg
4,883 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
2,335 kg
5,148 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
283 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V84.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V84.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
739 km
459 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
820 km
510 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.5 s
283 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
4.7 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Lightness
2,215 kg
4,883 lb
2,335 kg
5,148 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,872 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
739 km
459 mi
820 km
510 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,360 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
SVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
AMG GLS 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IISVR 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster