Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 30dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

30d

258 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 30d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    258 hp
    192 kW
  • Highest torque
    560 Nm
    413 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,417 km
    880 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)30dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
258hp192kW
250hp186kW
Torque
560Nm413lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,065kg4,553lb
1,902kg4,193lb
Gross weight
2,780kg6,129lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
31.4s
Calculated
30.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,417km880mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
550L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
60L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 30dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 30d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)30d4,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)30dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.4 s
30.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
258 hp
192 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

BMW X6 (F16) 30d has 8 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and BMW X6 (F16) 30d: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
2,065 kg
4,553 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,902 kg
4,193 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)30d
1,417 km
880 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)30d
258 hp
192 kW
6.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)30d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)30d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)30d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)30d
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)30dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
258 hp
192 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,065 kg
4,553 lb
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,417 km
880 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 30dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 30d

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 637 km (396 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 163 kg lighter
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 30d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

30d
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (E71)40d
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (G06)30d
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202330d
2.0 T5
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201430d
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
30d
25d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX1 (F48)25d
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
30d
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)30dvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
BMW X6 (F16) 30d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster