Car comparison

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0ivsMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X3 (E83)

3.0i

231 hp2979 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2003-2006
VS

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Highest torque
    303 Nm
    223 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    600 km
    373 mi
  • Best economy score
    80/100

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i

  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX3 (E83)3.0iMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
231hp172kW
202hp151kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
303Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
91.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
41.0s
Calculated
39.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
554km344mi
Calculated
600km373mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,569mm180in
4,550mm179in
Width
1,853mm73in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,620mm64in
Wheelbase
2,795mm110in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,495mm59in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
-
Trunk volume
500L
402L
Max trunk volume
1,560L
1,705L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
67L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0iMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i5,900 rpm3,500 rpm6,150 rpm
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX3 (E83)3.0iMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.0 s
39.0 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
90 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
231 hp
172 kW
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i has 29 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
221 km/h
137 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i8.1 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s

Although BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i has more power, Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
554 km
344 mi
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
231 hp
172 kW
8.1 s
221 km/h
137 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
8.1 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX3 (E83)3.0i
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX3 (E83)3.0iMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
231 hp
172 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.7 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Range score
554 km
344 mi
600 km
373 mi
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X3 (E83) 3.0iMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.18 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.08 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,176 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 98 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0i
3.0si
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
3.0i
28i
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
3.0i
28i
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
3.0i
25d
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (G01)25d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
3.0i
30i
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (G01 LCI)Facelift 202130i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
3.0i
30
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0ivsBMWX3 (G45)30
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i vs Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster