BMW X3 (E83)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0ivsBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 3.0si
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
3.0si
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque315 Nm232 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range663 km412 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score80/100
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.0s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 554km344mi Calculated | 663km412mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,853mm73in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,795mm110in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 243g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.0 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si has 41 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 8.1 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 554 km 344 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 663 km 412 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.1 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (E83)3.0i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 554 km 344 mi | 663 km 412 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 243 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0i
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























