Bentley Mulsanne II
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsBufori Geneva 6.4i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBufori Geneva
6.4i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score62/100
Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8
- Lightest2,450 kg5,401 lb
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 477hp356kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 3,090kg6,812lb | - |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 568km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,424cc392cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,540mm218in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,570mm141in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has 35 hp more than Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | BuforiGeneva6.4i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 477 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 568 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 390 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Bufori Geneva 6.4i V8
- Is 135 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























