Qvale Mangusta
Car comparison
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsBentley Azure 6.8 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.8 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.3 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score59/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 322hp240kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 425Nm313lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 108.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 562km349mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 6,748cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 193L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has 86 hp more than Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 86 hp (64 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 has more power, Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V and Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BentleyAzure6.8 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322 hp 240 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.8 L/100 km 13.2 mpg US 15.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 562 km 349 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 193 L 6.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,670 L705 US gal587 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,673 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 1,210 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.8 i V8
- Has 86 hp more
- Has 325 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























