Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best economy score74/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Most powerful389 hp290 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 389hp290kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 103.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 25.7L/100 km9.2mpg US11.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 512km318mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 5,342mm210in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 293g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has 79 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 79 hp (59 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 389 hp 290 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 512 km 318 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 293 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Is 1,005 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 79 hp more
- Has 289 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























