BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645CivsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Most powerful389 hp290 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best performance score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 389hp290kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 103.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 25.7L/100 km9.2mpg US11.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km378mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 5,342mm210in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has 56 hp more than BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6.2 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has more power, BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 389 hp 290 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 378 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Is 790 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























