BMW Z8 (E52)
Car comparison
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.1 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk203 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score68/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 389hp290kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 103.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 25.7L/100 km9.2mpg US11.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 5,342mm210in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,317mm52in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 203L | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW |
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 11 hp more than Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 2.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 389 hp 290 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 950 kg lighter
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 92 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 250 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























