Bentley Continental Flying Spur
Car comparison
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12vsBentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Arnage T
6.8i V8 Biturbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Lightest2,475 kg5,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption26.4 L/100 km8.9 mpg US10.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best economy score55/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 3,065kg6,757lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK | 28.8L/100 km8.2mpg US9.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,761cc413cu in |
| Length | 5,307mm209in | 5,400mm213in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,479mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | 3,116mm123in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 374L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 465g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 4,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW |
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 has 103 hp more than Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 103 hp (77 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 4.8 s |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW | 4.8 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.5 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 465 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 34.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,119 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Has 103 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 101 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Has 250 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























