AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest2,095 kg4,619 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range934 km580 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Gross weight | 2,820kg6,217lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 934km580mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 207g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 5,000-6,400 rpm | 1,370-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has 20 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 5.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 6.0 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 934 km 580 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 934 km 580 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 207 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Has 20 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























