Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 3.0 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest2,055 kg4,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 353hp263kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Gross weight | 2,835kg6,250lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 193mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 772L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,708L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 5,400-6,400 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has 7 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 6.0 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW | 6.0 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 353 hp 263 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 322 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Has 7 hp more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























