Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 450 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Lightest2,265 kg4,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score80/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Gross weight | 3,220kg7,099lb | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 900km559mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,946mm195in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,820mm72in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,997mm118in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,704mm67in | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 281mm11in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,860L | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 900 km 559 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Is 465 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Has 300 Nm more
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























