Ford Explorer VI
Car comparison
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,476 km1,538 mi
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score99/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Lightest2,265 kg4,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 555Nm409lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,391kg5,271lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,956cc180cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,778mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,025mm119in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | - | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,274L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 5,750 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has 11 hp more than Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 6.0 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 has more power, Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 7.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,476 km 1,538 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
| 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 5.08 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 761.25 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 55 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,576 km (979 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























