Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450vsFord Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Explorer VI
3.0 EcoBoost V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Lightest2,385 kg5,258 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk355 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,476 km1,538 mi
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score99/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 349hp260kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 555Nm409lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,391kg5,271lb |
| Gross weight | 3,230kg7,121lb | 3,160kg6,967lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km595mi Calculated | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | 2,956cc180cu in |
| Length | 5,207mm205in | 5,049mm199in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 2,004mm79in |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,778mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 3,025mm119in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,400L | 2,274L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has 18 hp more than Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 6.2 s |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has more power, Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 6.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 957 km 595 mi |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,476 km 1,538 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.2 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
| 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 349 hp 260 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 595 mi | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Has 18 hp more
- Is 6 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,518 km (943 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























