Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lightest2,265 kg4,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range957 km595 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Gross weight | 3,230kg7,121lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km595mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,207mm205in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | - |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,400L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has 7 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 957 km 595 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.2 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 595 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 450
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P360
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























