Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsAUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998
4.2 V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 698km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 5,034mm198in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,882mm113in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 525L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 310 hp 231 kW |
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V has 30 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 6.9 s |
Although AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V: 2.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 698 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 37 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























