AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 4.2 V8vsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Highest torque449 Nm331 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Largest trunk1,130 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 112.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 47.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 631km392mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 4,833mm190in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,453mm57in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,759mm109in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,648mm65in |
| Max trunk volume | 434L | 1,130L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 95L |
| CO2 emissions | 312g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 47.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 6.9 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 631 km 392 mi |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 631 km 392 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 312 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 434 L 15.3 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8
- Is 409 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 49 Nm more
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 696 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























