Bentley Continental GT II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12vsAston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin Vanquish II
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful573 hp427 kW
- Lightest1,739 kg3,834 lb
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.4 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions335 g/km
- Best performance score87/100
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 567hp423kW | 573hp427kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 1,739kg3,834lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | - |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 55.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 329hp/t246kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 621km386mi Calculated | 542km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,692mm185in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 338g/km | 335g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 6 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 542 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 4.1 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 567 hp 423 kW | 573 hp 427 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 621 km 386 mi | 542 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 338 g/km | 335 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 581 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























