Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful573 hp427 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,739 kg3,834 lb
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.4 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions333 g/km
- Best estimated range545 km339 mi
- Best economy score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 573hp427kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 67.2s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 329hp/t246kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,692mm185in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 2,061mm81in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,282mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,740mm108in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 335g/km | 333g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.1 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 56 hp more than Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 4.1 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 542 km 337 mi |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 4.1 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 573 hp 427 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 335 g/km | 333 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 | Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 56 hp more
- Is 46 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























