Aston Martin V12 Zagato
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12vsAston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin Vanquish II
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful573 hp427 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.4 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions335 g/km
- Best estimated range542 km337 mi
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score68/100
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 573hp427kW |
| Torque | 570Nm420lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,739kg3,834lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 55.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t229kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 329hp/t246kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 542km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,692mm185in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 388g/km | 335g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 56 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 4.2 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 488 km 303 mi |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 542 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.2 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 4.1 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
| 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 573 hp 427 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 542 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 388 g/km | 335 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.70 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 46.19 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,305 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 53 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























