Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsAston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin Vanquish II
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.9 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range574 km357 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful573 hp427 kW
- Lightest1,739 kg3,834 lb
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 573hp427kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,753kg3,865lb | 1,739kg3,834lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.0s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 55.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 329hp/t246kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 542km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,804mm189in | 4,692mm185in |
| Width | - | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,312mm52in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,740mm108in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 330L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 335g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 23 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 574 km 357 mi |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 542 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 4.1 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 573 hp 427 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 542 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 335 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























