Aston Martin V12 Zagato
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12vsAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight308 hp/t229 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.6 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions333 g/km
- Best estimated range545 km339 mi
- Best economy score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 570Nm420lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 65.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t229kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,282mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 388g/km | 333g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 4.2 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 and Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 488 km 303 mi |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.2 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
| 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 388 g/km | 333 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 | Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.70 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 46.19 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,305 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 55 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























