Bentley Continental GT II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.4 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions338 g/km
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 567hp423kW | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 91.6s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 621km386mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 338g/km | 347g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 567 hp 423 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 621 km 386 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 338 g/km | 347 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























