Donkervoort F22
Car comparison
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSIvsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest716 kg1,579 lb
- Best power-to-weight698 hp/t521 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range676 km420 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score88/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 716kg1,579lb | 1,628kg3,589lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.0s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 698hp/t521kW/t317hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 894Nm/t598lb-ft/ton Calculated | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 676km420mi Calculated | 646km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,039mm159in | 4,465mm176in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 298L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 6,360 rpm | 5,150 rpm | 6,610 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.4 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.9 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 716 kg 1,579 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 2.5 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
Although Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 has more power, Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 676 km 420 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 646 km 401 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 2.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 2.5 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 716 kg 1,579 lb | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 676 km 420 mi | 646 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 298 L 10.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Is 912 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 385 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























