Maserati MC20 Cielo
Car comparison
Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6vsDonkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDonkervoort F22
2.5 R5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Lightest716 kg1,579 lb
- Best power-to-weight698 hp/t521 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range676 km420 mi
- Largest trunk298 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630hp470kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 640Nm472lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 716kg1,579lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 40.0s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 9.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 409hp/t305kW/t186hp/1000 lb Calculated | 698hp/t521kW/t317hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 894Nm/t598lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 522km324mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,669mm184in | 4,039mm159in |
| Width | 1,965mm77in | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,218mm48in | 1,105mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,420mm95in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 50L | 298L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,500 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 6,360 rpm | 5,150 rpm | 6,610 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 47.0 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 8.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 9.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6 has 130 hp more than Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6: 130 hp (97 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 716 kg 1,579 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 3.0 s |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 2.5 s |
Although Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6 has more power, Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 522 km 324 mi |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 2.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 2.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6 | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp 470 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 716 kg 1,579 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 522 km 324 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 50 L 1.8 cu ft | 298 L 10.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 409 hp/t 305 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6 | Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati MC20 Cielo 3.0 V6
- Has 130 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Is 824 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 289 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range
- Has 248 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























