Donkervoort F22
Car comparison
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R232)
AMG SL 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Lightest716 kg1,579 lb
- Best power-to-weight698 hp/t521 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range676 km420 mi
- Largest trunk298 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score88/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 716kg1,579lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.0s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.9s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 698hp/t521kW/t317hp/1000 lb Calculated | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 894Nm/t598lb-ft/ton Calculated | 373Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 676km420mi Calculated | 551km342mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,039mm159in | 4,705mm185in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,359mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 298L | 213L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 6,360 rpm | 5,150 rpm | 6,610 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.4 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.9 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8 and Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 716 kg 1,579 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8: 5.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 676 km 420 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 551 km 342 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 2.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 3.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 716 kg 1,579 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 676 km 420 mi | 551 km 342 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 298 L 10.5 cu ft | 213 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 1,159 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 444 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 55 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























