Donkervoort F22
Car comparison
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest716 kg1,579 lb
- Best power-to-weight698 hp/t521 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range676 km420 mi
- Largest trunk298 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Most powerful522 hp389 kW
- Highest torque670 Nm494 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 522hp389kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 670Nm494lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 716kg1,579lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.0s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 58.8s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s | 11.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 698hp/t521kW/t317hp/1000 lb Calculated | 321hp/t240kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 894Nm/t598lb-ft/ton Calculated | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 676km420mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,039mm159in | 4,551mm179in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,260mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,678mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 96mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 298L | 165L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 262g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 6,360 rpm | 5,150 rpm | 6,610 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 11.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.4 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.9 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has 22 hp more than Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 716 kg 1,579 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has more power, Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 676 km 420 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 2.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW | 3.8 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DonkervoortF222.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 522 hp 389 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 716 kg 1,579 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 676 km 420 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 262 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 298 L 10.5 cu ft | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 698 hp/t 521 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Donkervoort F22 2.5 R5 TFSI
- Is 909 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 377 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























