Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II)
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32VvsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Lightest1,628 kg3,589 lb
- Best power-to-weight313 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score77/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful557 hp415 kW
- Highest torque745 Nm549 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 557hp415kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 745Nm549lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,628kg3,589lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 646km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,340cc326cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,465mm176in |
| Width | 1,924mm76in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,330mm52in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,610mm103in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 105L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V has 47 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V: 47 hp (35 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 745 Nm 549 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 4.7 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
Although Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V has more power, Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 557 hp 415 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 745 Nm 549 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 646 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage (II) 5.3 i V8 32V
- Has 47 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Is 292 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























