Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8vsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range646 km401 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed308 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful522 hp389 kW
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t240 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 522hp389kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 670Nm494lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,628kg3,589lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.3s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t240kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 646km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,551mm179in | 4,465mm176in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,260mm50in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,678mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 96mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 165L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.3 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has 12 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 565 km 351 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 646 km 401 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW | 3.8 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 522 hp 389 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 646 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 3 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Has 15 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























