Car comparison

Artega GT 3.6 V6vsLotus Evora 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Artega GT

3.6 V6

300 hp3597 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2010-2012
VS

Lotus Evora

3.5 V6

280 hp3456 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph Unrestricted
    270 km/h
    168 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,285 kg
    2,833 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    233 hp/t
    174 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    708 km
    440 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    36/100

Lotus Evora 3.5 V6

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.4 L/100 km
    19.0 mpg US
    22.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelArtegaGT3.6 V6LotusEvora3.5 V6
Power
300hp224kW
280hp209kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
342Nm252lb-ft
Curb weight
1,285kg2,833lb
1,382kg3,047lb
Gross weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,782kg3,929lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
261 km/h
162 mph
To 99% top speed
66.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
64.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
17.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
690km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,015mm158in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,848mm73in
Height
1,180mm46in
1,229mm48in
Wheelbase
2,460mm97in
2,575mm101in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,564mm62in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,557mm61in
Ground clearance-
125mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
160L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
68L
60L
CO2 emissions
223g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Artega GT 3.6 V6Lotus Evora 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V66,600 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,850 rpm
LotusEvora3.5 V66,400 rpm4,700 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricArtegaGT3.6 V6LotusEvora3.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
17.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
261 km/h
162 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
114 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
LotusEvora3.5 V6
280 hp
209 kW

Artega GT 3.6 V6 has 20 hp more than Lotus Evora 3.5 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Artega GT 3.6 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LotusEvora3.5 V6
342 Nm
252 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
LotusEvora3.5 V6
1,382 kg
3,047 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
LotusEvora3.5 V6
261 km/h
162 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V64.8 s
LotusEvora3.5 V64.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
LotusEvora3.5 V6
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Artega GT 3.6 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
LotusEvora3.5 V6
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
708 km
440 mi
LotusEvora3.5 V6
690 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
LotusEvora3.5 V6
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
261 km/h
162 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
LotusEvora3.5 V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
261 km/h
162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
LotusEvora3.5 V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
261 km/h
162 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Artega GT 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
4.8 s
LotusEvora3.5 V6
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
LotusEvora3.5 V6
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleArtegaGT3.6 V6LotusEvora3.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
342 Nm
252 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
261 km/h
162 mph
Lightness
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
1,382 kg
3,047 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
690 km
429 mi
CO2 score
223 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleArtega GT 3.6 V6Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 97 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 140 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lotus Evora 3.5 V6

  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Artega GT 3.6 V6
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 V6
S 3.4
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora S3.5 V6
3.6 V6
135i
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
3.6 V6
3.8 V6 24V
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsHyundaiGenesis Coupe3.8 V6 24V
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
3.6 V6
3.0
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsBMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
3.6 V6
E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6
3.6 V6
3.7
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsNissan370Z3.7
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT3.5 V6
Artega GT 3.6 V6 vs Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster