Lotus Evora Sport 410
Car comparison
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,337 kg2,948 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range690 km429 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 342Nm252lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,337kg2,948lb | 1,382kg3,047lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,782kg3,929lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 64.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | - | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | - | 1,848mm73in |
| Height | - | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 has 130 hp more than Lotus Evora 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 130 hp (97 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Has 130 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 104 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























