Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0vsLotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora Sport 410
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Best estimated range831 km516 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,337 kg2,948 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,337kg2,948lb |
| Gross weight | 1,915kg4,222lb | - |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.5s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 55.9s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 288hp/t215kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km516mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,499mm177in | - |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,302mm51in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | - |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 145L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0 has 10 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 831 km 516 mi |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.1 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera S 3.0 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 516 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0 | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera S 3.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 213 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 51 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Is 123 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























