Lotus Evora GT
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora Sport 410
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,337 kg2,948 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,408kg3,104lb | 1,337kg2,948lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 470km292mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | - |
| Width | 1,972mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 273g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 has 6 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 3.8 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 470 km 292 mi |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb | 1,337 kg 2,948 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 470 km 292 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 273 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 48 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























