Lotus Emira
Car comparison
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0vsLotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora GT
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful421 hp314 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range630 km392 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Lightest1,408 kg3,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,408kg3,104lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | - |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 52.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km392mi Calculated | 470km292mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,413mm174in | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,972mm78in |
| Height | 1,230mm48in | 1,223mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | - |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 151L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 273g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 has 5 hp more than Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 3.8 s |
Although Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 has more power, Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 630 km 392 mi |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 470 km 292 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW | 3.9 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 392 mi | 470 km 292 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 273 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 151 L 5.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 | Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 160 km (100 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Is 47 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























