Maserati GranTurismo II · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo II · Facelift 2026 3.0 V6vsLotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Emira
420 Sport 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best estimated range680 km422 mi
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.9s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s Calculated | 12.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km422mi Calculated | 630km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,413mm174in |
| Width | 1,957mm77in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,230mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,929mm115in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,659mm65in | 1,624mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,670mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 151L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 490 hp 365 kW |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 has 69 hp more than Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: 69 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 3.9 s |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 3.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 680 km 422 mi |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 630 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.9 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW | 3.9 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6 | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | 300 km/h 186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 422 mi | 630 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 151 L 5.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 | Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo II Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Has 69 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 159 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























