Lotus Emira
Car comparison
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
AMG GLC 53
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Best estimated range639 km397 mi
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 640Nm472lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 2,640kg5,820lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km392mi Calculated | 639km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,999cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,413mm174in | 4,792mm189in |
| Width | - | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,230mm48in | 1,603mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | - |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 151L | 545L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 has 28 hp more than Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 4.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 has more power, Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 630 km 392 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 639 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 421 hp 314 kW | 3.9 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEmira420 Sport 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 392 mi | 639 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 151 L 5.3 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Emira 420 Sport 2.0
- Is 550 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 9 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 394 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























